[Manual] [Contents] [Prev] [Next]

II.7 - Nitrogen from Spill
II.7.1 - Theory

Equations for nitrogen supersaturation are of two types. One type constitutes empirical equations with no underlying theory but which provide a general fit to observed supersaturation data as a function of spill. The other type constitutes mechanistic equations which define nitrogen levels in terms of physical processes producing spill. CRiSP.1 contains two empirical models and two mechanistic models. CRiSP.1 is calibrated to all submodels. In general, we recommend using the model called Gas Spill 2. Relevant parameters in the submodels are illustrated in Fig. 45.
Fig. 45 Representation of spillway and stilling basin.

Exponential Saturation Equation

An empirical nitrogen supersaturation equation based on an exponential relationship between spill flow and supersaturation in the spilled water can be expressed

(112)

where

The exponential equation was developed first and was used in CRiSP.1 version 3. It is retained in version 4 for backward compatibility of models. The hyperbolic model fits the data better than the exponential model.

Hyperbolic Saturation Equation

The nitrogen supersaturation equation data can also be fit with a hyperbolic relationship between spill flow and supersaturation. The relationship is

(113)

where

Although this submodel can produce a degree of supersaturation at zero spill flow (when h = 0), this does not contribute to supersaturation in the tailrace water since the contribution of spill water to the tailrace is zero with zero spill as is defined in eq (123). This model is the preferred empirical model and should be used in place of the exponential model if an empirical model is selected.

Mechanistic Equation

The theory for nitrogen supersaturation from the physical process of spilling water and dissolving excess nitrogen in the tailrace water is developed below.1 The mechanistic model begins with an equation for nitrogen concentration as

(114)

where

(115) (116)

(117)

(118)

(119) Gas Spill 1

Gas Spill 1 is a three-parameter multiplicative model, used by the Corps of Engineers at Bonneville Dam only. The equation is

(120)

Gas Spill 2

Gas Spill 2 is a three-parameter additive model used at all other dams. It is defined

(121)

where

(122) The original WRE model used a two-parameter multiplicative model, which was identical to Gas Spill 1 with c = 0.

Nitrogen in the Tailrace

Nitrogen supersaturation in the tailrace results from mixing spill water with water passing through turbines (Fig. 45). The equation is

(123)

where

Nitrogen at a Confluence

The nitrogen at a confluence is determined by the addition of two flows with different nitrogen levels. The equation is

(124)

where

Nitrogen Dissipation

Nitrogen levels above the saturation level are lost from the river as a first order process. This is defined (WRE) by a total flux equation for a segment as

(125)

where

(126)

where

To express the loss in terms of concentration we divided eq (125) by AD to give

(127)

To put the calculation in units of miles and days, note that one mile = 16.0934 x 104 cm = 5280 ft, and one day = 8.64 x104 seconds. Expressing U in miles/day and D in feet and Dm in cm2/s, the diffusion coefficient per unit square mile of river is

(128)

where the coefficient k is expressed

(129)

assuming:

Dm = order2 of 2 x 10-5 cm2s-1
U = order of (20 miles/day) 1.2 ft/s. Note this changes on a daily basis and for each reach in the model
D = order of 30 ft. Note this changes on a reach specific basis and is dependent on reservoir elevation.
The constant 700.75 gives the coefficient k in unit of day-1
Nitrogen loss rate due to degassing can be expressed as a function of time since the water entered the tailrace. The equation describing the nitrogen level as a function of residence time in a river segment is

(130)

where

Noting that in the models N is in terms of percent above supersaturation we then set Neq = 0.

Adjustments of k

The nitrogen dissipation coefficient depends on the average depth as defined in eq (129). The average depth is variable according to the geometry of the reservoir and the pool elevation. This depth is defined as

(131)

where


[Manual] [Contents] [Prev] [Next]
1This model was developed by Water Resources Engineers (WRE), Inc. (1971) for the Corps of Engineers and reviewed by Boyer (1974).

2F.A. Richards 1965.

Columbia River Salmon Passage Model CRiSP.1.5 Theory, Calibration & Validation Manual
Copyright © 1996, Columbia Basin Research. All rights reserved.

web@cbr.washington.edu