CRiSP1.6 Theory & Calibration Manual: V. Parameter Definitions INDEXTOCPREVNEXT

V. Parameter Definitions

Equation parameters and their descriptions are given in Table 57. Dam and reservoir activities are assumed to be identical for all dams and reservoirs. Exceptions are treated individually, so there is no index for the specific dam or reservoir. Within CRiSP.1, parameters for each dam and reservoir are unique.

Table 57 Equation parameters and their descriptions
Equation Parameters
F(t)week (j) weekly variation in flow for headwater dam j
G flow scaling factor in kcfs
an, bn Fourier coefficients
t day of the year
offset for day of week alignment
Fday daily variation in flow in kcfs at headwater dam
r deterministic rate of change of flow per unit of flow (the range is confined such that 0 < r < 1)
intensity on the random variations in flow
w(t) Gaussian white noise process describing the temporal aspects of the flow variation
FD(r) flow output at dam immediately below reach r
FL(r) new flow loss at reach r, as adjusted for mass imbalance
FM(r) flow maximum at reach r
FM(i) flow maximum at reach i
FR(j) flow at regulation point j
n number of upstream regulated points
p number of reaches between dam r and all regulation point
Floss (i) modulated flow loss at downstream dam i
i the standard deviation of the difference in flows (kcfs) at dam i and i +1 as computed by daily observed flows at all dams over the years 1979-1981
FTU(r) total unregulated flow input to dam r
p number of regulated flows in region
FD(r) flow output at dam r
FR(j) flow output at regulation point j
Ki flow coefficient at unregulated headwater i
q number of adjacent unregulated headwaters in region
FU max (i) maximum flow at unregulated headwater i or j
FD(r) flow output at dam immediately below reach r
FL(r) new flow loss at reach r, as adjusted for mass imbalance
FM(r) flow maximum at reach r or i
FR(j) flow at regulation point j
FU (i) flow at unregulated headwater i
m number of unregulated headwaters above r (m = 3 in Fig. 17)
n number of regulated points adjacent to nearest upstream regulation point (n = 2 in Fig. 17)
p number of reaches between dam r and all upstream regulation points (p = 9 in Fig. 17)
Fi (t) flow at regulation point i at reservoir time increment t
FL(i) flow loss at reach i
Fj (t) flow at regulation point j immediately upstream at reservoir time increment t
F(t)i modulated flow at dam i
F(t)arch(i) archive flow at dam i
F(t)day(j) daily modulated flow in regulated headwater j
F(t)week(j) weekly modulated flow in regulated headwater j
Floss(i) loss modulated flow in river segment upstream of dam i
Fmin(i) minimum allowable flow at dam i
J number of regulated headwaters upstream of dam i
I number of dams upstream of dam i, including dam i
t julian day (t = 1 to 365)
Yt estimated daily flow
m mean annual flow computed over a 10 year period
p fraction of mean annual flow for the scenario
et stochastic error term
Ft Fourier term
ak, bk Fourier coefficients estimated for each river
2/365
rt randomly generated variable from a normal distribution centered on 0 with variance appropriate for dry and wet years as described above
e0 0
dV change in reservoir volume in acre-ft
dt time increment, typically 1 day
FU unregulated natural flow into the reservoir in kcfs
FR regulated flow out of the reservoir, which is controlled by the user under volume constraints in kcfs
V(i) reservoir volume time step i with units of acre-ft
t one day increment
FU unregulated flows in kcfs
FR regulated flows in kcfs
c 1983.5, which is a conversion factor
FR outflow from reservoir according to the constraints
FU unregulated inflow to reservoir
Vrequest requested volume from reservoir
Frequest requested outflow from reservoir
V(i) reservoir volume in reservoir time step i
Vmax maximum reservoir volume
Vmin minimum reservoir volume
2/365
k value between 0 and 4
Hu full pool depth at the upstream end of the segment
Hd full pool depth at the downstream end of the segment
L pool length at full pool
x pool length at lowered pool
E pool elevation drop below full pool elevation
W pool width averaged over reach length at full pool
average slope of the pool side
F flow through the pool in kcfs
Ufree velocity of free flowing river
V(E) pool volume (ft3) as a function of elevation drop E in feet
F flow in 1000 cubic feet per second (kcfs)
L segment length in miles
x pool length defined by eq (27) and with units of feet
Ufree velocity of water in the free stream (kfs)
T residence time in this calculation is in kilo seconds (ks)
Hu full pool depth at the upstream end of the segment
U average river velocity in ft/s
Ufree the velocity of a free flowing stream in ft/s
F flow in kcfs
E elevation drop (positive downward) in ft
Hu depth of the upper end of the segment in ft
V1 and V2 volume elements defined by eq (31) and (32)
V(0) pool volume at full pool
Fi(t) flow from headwater i through the river segment in question on day t
i(t) temperature from headwater i on day t
(t) temperature for selected river segment on day t
X position of a fish down the axis of the river
dX /dt velocity of fish in migration
r average velocity of fish in the segment; this is a combination of water movement and fish behavior
spread parameter setting variability in the fish velocity
W(t) Gaussian white noise process to represent variation in velocity
cumulative distribution of the standard normal distribution
L segment length
r average migration velocity through the segment
r(t) migration rate (miles/day)
t julian date
b's regression coefficients, described above
a1 , a2 slope parameters
TSEASN seasonal inflection point (in julian days)
TRLS release date (in julian days)
r(t) determined from eq (48)
V(i) variance factor that varies between releases only
S measure of smolt density in the river segment and can be taken as the total number in the segment
mortality rate from all causes
Mp mortality rate from predation with units of time-1
Mtdg mortality rate from total dissolved gas supersaturation with units of time-1
S number of smolts leaving reservoir per day (smolts reservoir -1)
combined mortality rate as used in eq (54)
S0 (tj | ti) potential number of fish that enter the segment on day ti and survive to leave the segment on day tj
S (tj | ti) actual number of fish that enter the segment on day ti and leave on day tj
t reservoir computational time increment
N (ti) number of fish that enter the river segment on day ti
P (tj | ti) probability that a fish entering on day ti survives to exit on day tj (defined by eq (46))
T temperature (°C)
Pij the predator density in the ith zone (forebay, tailrace, or reach) for the jth project
ai the predator activity coefficient in the ith reservoir zone
f(T) the temperature response equation
CMAX the maximum consumption rate
T a slope parameter
TINF the inflection point of the curve
H forebay (tailrace) depth at full pool
h forebay (tailrace) depth at a lowered pool
P predator density at full pool for the forebay (tailrace)
Gs percent TDG above 100% as measured at the surface
Gc threshold above 100% at which the gas bubble disease mortality rate is observed to change more rapidly towards more lethal levels
a species-specific gas mortality rate coefficient with units of G-1 day-1 determining the initial rate of increase of mortality per %-increase in TDG
b species-specific gas mortality rate coefficient with units of G-1 day-1, determining the change in mortality rate at Gc
H() Heaviside function, also known as the unit step function; equal to zero when its argument is negative, and equal to one when its argument is positive
zD depth of the reservoir
zb maximum depth of fish distribution
zm mode of fish distribution
m0 slope of distribution function above mode
m1 slope of distribution function below mode
Mtdg(L) TDG mortality rate as a function of fish length
L fish length in mm
a 0.000472 mm-1, length coefficient for TDG mortality rate (regression of all data from the 112% shallow tank experiments conducted by Dawley et al. (1976))
L length of fish in environment
Le length of fish in TDG mortality experiments
Gright , Gleft percent TDG in the flow entering the reach on the respective sides
Sfr percent of river in the right-bank flow
Gmix flow weighted average of the TDG values in each flow
Gdif difference between the original concentrations of the two flows
E percent TDG in water at equilibrium, 100% saturation or 0% supersaturation
q diffusion rate constant in units of (mile)-1, a model parameter set for each reach
v average water velocity through the river segment
x distance downstream
t average water travel-time
x distance downstream and , where L is the pool length (miles)
c1 Gmix - E
c2 Gdif . (1-Sfr) for the right-bank flow
c2 - Gdif . Sfr for the left-bank flow (see eq (103) and eq (104))
q reservoir mixing coefficient in (miles)-1
E equilibrium value (0% supersaturation)
z fish depth
m a slope parameter
gc critical gas supersaturation at the surface where GBD mortality rate changes more rapidly towards more lethal levels
n indexes the julian day
i indexes the side of the river and hence the level of TDG on that side of the river; 1 indexes the right-bank and 2 indexes the left-bank
a species-specific gas mortality rate coefficient with units of G-1 day-1 determining the initial rate of increase of mortality per %-increase in TDG
b species-specific gas mortality rate coefficient with units of G-1 day-1, determining the change in mortality rate above Gc
S cumulative survival
Mtdg TDG mortality rate at a specific level of supersaturation
t exposure time
Gs TDG at the surface
gcorrection TDG experienced by the fish
z fish depth
m a slope parameter
S(t) reservoir survival after t days of migration
A 14.07
B 0.1822
S(t) reservoir survival after t days of migration
A 6.73 e-06 (TURB1); 8.623 e-04 (TURB4); 8.87 e-06 (TURB5)
B 3.16 (TURB1); 1.43 (TURB4); 3.02 (TURB5)
G percent total dissolved gas saturation above equilibrium (100%)
Qs total amount of spill in kcfs
m, b empirically fit slope and intercept parameters
G percent total dissolved gas saturation above equilibrium (100%)
Qs total amount of spill in kcfs
qs amount of spill through an individual spillbay
a,b,c empirically fit model parameters
G percent total dissolved gas saturation above equilibrium (100%)
Qs total amount of spill in kcfs
a, b and k coefficients specific to each dam derived from TDG rating curves provided by the Bolyvong Tanovan of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
G percent total dissolved gas saturation above equilibrium (100%)
Qs total amount of spill in kcfs
a, b and h coefficients specific to each dam and can be derived from TDG rating curves available from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Q total flow in kcfs
Qs spillway flow in kcfs
Gsb TDG concentration exiting the stilling basin in mg/l
Gfb TDG concentration in the forebay in mg/l
Geq TDG equilibrium concentration as a function of temperature (°C) at one atmosphere of pressure (mgl-1 atm-1)
L length of the stilling basin in feet
P0 barometric pressure in atmospheres (assume P0 is 1)
density of water (0.0295 atm/ft)
0 specific gravity of the roller at the base of the spill
W spillway width
D water depth at the end of the stilling basin
Y0 thickness of the spill at the stilling basin entrance, where
H hydraulic head expressing the forebay elevation minus the elevation of the spilling basin floor (H is in ft and gravity constant g is 32 ft s-2)
differential pressure factor defined
Ke bubble entrainment coefficient with units of ft s-1atm-1/3 and is defined
T temperature (°C)
K20 temperature compensated entrainment coefficient
E energy loss rate expressed as total headloss divided by residence time of water in the stilling basin
P forebay percent saturation
a, b, and c dam dependent empirical coefficients
Gspill percent TDG in the spill side flow exiting the tailrace
Gphouse percent TDG in the powerhouse side flow exiting the tailrace
Sfr percent of river in the spill side flow
Gmix flow weighted average of two gas levels
Gdif difference between the original concentrations of the two flows
Gspill percent TDG in the spill side flow exiting the tailrace
Gphouse percent TDG in the powerhouse side flow exiting the tailrace
Gforebay percent TDG in the forebay
Qs total amount of spill flow
Gright , Gleft percent TDG in the flow entering the reach on the respective sides
Sfr percent of river in the right-bank flow
Gmix flow weighted average of the TDG values in each flow
Gdif difference between the original concentrations of the two flows at the head of the reach
E percent TDG in water at equilibrium, 100% saturation or 0% supersaturation
q diffusion rate constant in units of (mile)-1, a model parameter set for each reach
k dissipation rate constant in units of (day)-1, a model parameter calculated for each reach based on the river depth, velocity and a diffusion constant (see eq (107))
x longitudinal distance, where x is in miles
v river velocity, in miles per day
Q total flow through the dam in kcfs
Qs spill flow in kcfs
G tailrace TDG supersaturation (in percent)
Gfb forebay TDG supersaturation (in percent)
Gsf spill water TDG in percent saturation as defined by an empirical or mechanistic saturation equation
Qi flow in kcfs in segment i
Gi TDG in percent supersaturation in segment i of the confluences
flux of TDG across the air/water interface
G TDG supersaturation concentration in the segment
Geq TDG equilibrium concentration
A surface area of the segment
Kd transfer coefficient defined
Dm molecular diffusion coefficient of TDG
U hydraulic stream velocity
D depth of the segment
Dm order of 2 x 10-5 cm2s-1 (Richards 1965)
U order of 3 cm/s (20 miles/day), note this changes on a daily basis and for each reach in the model
D order of 900 cm, note this changes on a reach specific basis and is dependent on reservoir elevation
the constant 700.75 gives the coefficient k in unit of day-1
Geq TDG equilibrium concentration
G(0) tailrace concentration defined by eq (109)
k dissipation coefficient defined by eq (115)
t time in a river segment
Volume pool volume at a specific elevation
W average pool width at full pool
L length of pool
t instantaneous probability of passage
p proportion of time step during day
(1-p) proportion of time step during night
Vt upstream river velocity in mi/day
SPt proportion of river spilled
Dt julian date
's and 's parameters that vary by dam and species
Y fraction of total fish passed in spill
X fraction of water spilled
a and b regression coefficients
e error term (var) selected from random distribution
fge fish guidance efficiency
z median depth of fish in the forebay at a distance from the dam where fish are susceptible to being drawn into the intake
D screen depth relative to full pool forebay elevation
Dc FGE calibration parameter
E amount the pool is lowered below full pool elevation
t fish age since the onset of smoltification
t0 onset of change in FGE relative to the onset of smoltification, set in the Release window
t increment of time over which FGE changes
z0 initial mean fish depth (at age t equals 0) in the forebay
z1 final mean fish depth (at age t equals t0 + t) in the forebay
fge0 FGE at onset of smoltification
E(t) elevation drop
D fraction of fish that pass dam during spill hours
Fsp fraction of daily flow that passes in spill
SE fraction of fish that pass in spill relative to the fraction of flow passing in spill
FGE fraction of fish passing into turbine intake that are bypassed
x deterministic part of the random parameter fixed for each species and dam
x' stochastic part of the parameter taken from a broken-stick distribution (see Section II.7.1 Stochastic Parameter Probability Density) over each dam time slice
y spill efficiency
x percent flow
a and b deterministic parameters
e stochastic parameter selected from a normal distribution
Ntu number of fish passing in a time increment (6 hours)
Nfo number of fish in forebay ready to pass in the increment
p probability of passing during the increment (1 - P1 from eq (119))
mfo mortality in forebay (see Section II.4.2 Predation Mortality)
mtu mortality in turbine passage
fge fish guidance efficiency for a day or night period
Y proportion of fish passage in spill defined by spill efficiency equation (see eq (120))
mby mortality in the bypass
mtr mortality in the transport
msp mortality in the spill passage
T/C ratio of survival of transport fish to control fish from transport experiments
Vn in river survival of spring chinook smolts
a, b, Vt a = 5.8259, b = 5.3533, Vt = 0.98
T/C ratio of survival of transport fish to control fish from transport experiments
Vn in river survival of spring chinook smolts
a 0.3281 (TURB1); 0.3330 (TURB4); 0.3292 (TURB5)
b 0.1936 (TURB1); 0.1596 (TURB4); 0.1868 (TURB5)
x unit uniform random deviate range 0 < x < 1
yl lower limit of the distribution range
ym distribution of the median value
yu upper limit of the distribution range
r(t) determined from eq (48)
V(i) variance factor which is different for each release i
G percent supersaturation above 100%
Qs spillway flow volume in kcfs
a, b and h coefficients specific to each dam, derived from TDG rating curves provided by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
K20 entrainment coefficient
E energy loss rate
P forebay percent saturation
a, b, and c coefficients calculated from multiple linear regression of data in Table 51
T water temperature in the forebay in °C
Qs spill in kcfs
W spillway width (gates x width/gate)
L stilling basin length in feet
T water temperature in the river segment
r(t) migration rate (miles/day)
t julian date
b0, b1, bFLOW migration rate regression coefficients
Vf average river velocity during the average migration period
1, a2 slope parameters
TSEASN inflection point of flow dependent term (julian day)
TRLS release date (julian day)

CRiSP1.6 Theory & Calibration Manual: V. Parameter Definitions INDEXTOCPREVNEXT

Please direct questions or comments to:
web@cbr.washington.edu
Columbia Basin Research,
School of Aquatic & Fishery Sciences,
University of Washington