List of Tables

CRiSP1.6 Theory & Calibration Manual: List of Tables

List of Tables

Table 1 Daily modulator parameters

Table 2 Variance about mean flow for observed and modulated flows at three dams in 1981

Table 3 Flow loss modulator parameter for eq (8)

Table 4 Flow minimum (kcfs) at dams.

Table 5 Unregulated headwater flow parameter values

Table 6 Regulated headwater flow parameter values

Table 7 Maximum unregulated flow (kcfs)

Table 8 Storage reservoirs; shaded items are used in model

Table 9 Storage reservoirs flood control elevation rule curves

Table 10 Geometric data on Columbia River system

Table 11 Summary of the forms of the predation mortality rate equation

Table 12 Population abundance estimates for John Day Pool, 1984-1986 (Beamesderfer and Rieman 1991); the 95% confidence intervals are in parentheses.

Table 13 Northern pikeminnow density and distribution in John Day Pool, based on 1990-1991 CPUE data, assuming total abundance the same as 1984-1986.

Table 14 Walleye density and distribution in John Day Pool, 1984-1986; relative densities are mean for 1984-1986 from Beamesderfer and Rieman (1988).

Table 15 Smallmouth bass density and distribution in John Day Pool, 1984-1986; relative densities are mean for 1984-1986 from Beamesderfer and Rieman (1988).

Table 16 Mean daily salmonid consumption estimates for the major predators (salmonids predator^-1 day^-1) from Vigg et al. (1991); walleye and smallmouth bass estimates are for the reservoir only.

Table 17 Consumption rates for N. Pikeminnow, Walleye and Smallmouth Bass in John Day Pool, 1984-1986, from Vigg et al. (1991); mean for April-June.

Table 18 Consumption rates for N. Pikeminnow, Walleye and Smallmouth Bass in John Day Pool, 1984-1986, from Vigg et al. (1991); mean for July-August.

Table 19 Pikeminnow density indices (CPUE) in all reservoir zones, 1990-1991

Table 20 Relative CPUEs for smallmouth bass and walleye in the Snake and Columbia rivers (standardized to John Day Pool) based on the abundances from Zimmerman and Parker (1995). Raw data from N. Bouwes, ODFW, pers. com. Also given are CPUEs for the upper Columbia (not standardized to John Day Pool) from Loch et al. (1994).

Table 21 River dimensions for the Snake and Columbia rivers (Ward et al. 1995) and for the upper Columbia River (Loch et al. 1994). Tailrace (at the head of the reservoir) is assumed to be 0.6 km in length; forebay is assumed to be 6.0 km in length.

Table 22 1990 predator densities for spring (SP) and fall (FA) migrations, by reach and zone. Pikeminnow fraction (% PM) are given for Snake and lower Columbia reaches that are subjected to the pikeminnow removal program.

Table 23 Pikeminnow reduction program on the Snake and lower Columbia rivers. Percent reduction in predation due to pikeminnows as a result of the pikeminnow removal program at each reservoir for each year (Peters et al. 1999, 113). Estimates of predation reduction for 2001-2006 are included in Peters et al. (1999, 113).

Table 24 Chinook mortality rates based on survival data from Dawley et al. (1976) shallow (0.25m) and deep (2.5m) tank experiments.

Table 25 Steelhead mortality rates based on survival data and mortality rates from Dawley et al. (1976) shallow (0.25m) and deep (2.5m) tank experiments.

Table 26 Depths of fish in the deep water tanks and g_correction used to determine mortality rate coefficients

Table 27 Total dissolved gas mortality rates and fish length in shallow tank experiments (Dawley et al. 1976). Plotting symbols refer to Fig. 35.

Table 28 Fish vertical distributions and references

Table 29 TDG mortality coefficients

Table 30 Spill side tokens for each dam

Table 31 Tailrace Mixing coefficients

Table 32 Estimations of k_entrain from CRiSP.1 runs using filtered Columbia River Data Access in Real Time (DART) data (observed and modeled TDG > 100%)

Table 33 Spill efficiency (% fish passed in spillway /% flow passed in spillway).

Table 34 Historical FGE values for each dam, by species as determined by PATH and used for CRiSP.1 (L.D. Krasnow, National Marine Fisheries Service, NWFSC, pers. com., 2000).

Table 35 Bypass and forebay elevations of dams with bypass systems

Table 36 Recent turbine mortality estimates

Table 37 Percent mortality at dams: m = mean, l = low, h = high. These mortality estimates are applied to spring chinook and steelhead analyses. High estimates of bypass and turbine mortalities are from Marmorek and Peters (1998).

Table 38 Historical transport operations, 1975-1999, at Lower Granite (LWG), Little Goose (LGS), Lower Monumental (LMN), and McNary (MCN) dams.

Table 39 Smolt Index passage data used to determine high flow percent hfl_pass_perc at McNary Dam based on the separation criterion.

Table 40 Transport separation parameters for historical data files, 1975-1999, at Lower Granite (LWG), Little Goose (LGS), Lower Monumental (LMN), and McNary (MCN) dams.

Table 41 Separation Probability (separation_prob) estimates as used in CRiSP.1, based on the total number of fish collected and the total number of fish transported from each transportation dam.

Table 42 Little Goose Separator Efficiencies from the Juvenile Transportation Program annual reports (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 1996c, 1999b).

Table 43 Lower Monumental Separator Efficiencies from the Juvenile Transportation Program annual reports (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 1999b).

Table 44 McNary Separator Efficiencies from the Juvenile Transportation Program annual reports (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 1996c, 1999b).

Table 45 Model probability density functions

Table 46 Lower Snake and Lower Columbia dams, gas production curves using linear or exponential models.

Table 47 Upper Columbia dams and Dworshak Dam gas production curves using linear or exponential model

Table 48 Hells Canyon Dam gas production curves using exponential model

Table 49 Values for exponential empirical TDG model

Table 50 Values for hyperbolic empirical TDG model

Table 51 Parameters for GasSpill 2 model equation

Table 52 Variables for reservoir geometry, in feet

Table 53 Spring chinook CRiSP.1 survivals and NMFS survivals for the research reach and down to Bonneville for each year.

Table 54 Steelhead CRiSP.1 survivals and NMFS survivals for the research reach and down to Bonneville for each year.

Table 55 Fall chinook CRiSP.1 survivals and NMFS survivals for the research reach and down to Bonneville for each year.

Table 56 Upper Columbia steelhead and yearling fall chinook CRiSP.1 survivals and estimated survivals for the research reach and down to Bonneville for each year.

Table 57 Equation parameters and their descriptions

CRiSP1.6 Theory & Calibration Manual: List of Tables

Please direct questions or comments to:
web@cbr.washington.edu
Columbia Basin Research,
School of Aquatic & Fishery Sciences,
University of Washington