[Manual] [Contents] [Prev] [Next]

I.2.1 - CRiSP.1 In Context with Other Models

CRiSP.1 is one of several models describing the passage of juvenile salmon through the river system. The major mainstem passage models and their time steps are outlined below. All of these models describe fish survival through the river system but differ in the details included. The simplest model is PAM and the most complex is CRiSP.1.5. With increasing complexity, the other models fall in between. PAM and CRiSP.0 are close to SPM, FLUSH lies in the middle and CREM and RESPRED are in turn more complex. Simple and complex models each have advantages and disadvantages and the choice depends in part on the types of questions being addressed. Simple models are easy to understand and do not require large amounts of data since they are generally developed to the degree of resolution of the available data. Unfortunately, since they are designed to fix existing data, the variables are identified from past studies and there is no formal process to assess if chosen variables are insignificant or the driving variables. Simple models, being empirical and based on existing data, typically fit the available data but it is not clear that they would still represent the system if the system were to change.

In general, complex models are based on underlying mechanisms which are inferred from analogous systems. As such, they often can be extended beyond the data of the system they are modeling. Mechanistic models are particularly useful for developing hypotheses that are to be tested through experimentation. A disadvantage of such models is that they require a considerable effort to understand and calibrate, and there is a chance that the underlying mechanisms may be misapplied or inappropriate, as can also be the case with simple empirical models.

The tags of "simple and empirical" vs. "complex and mechanistic" are, in fact, only points along a continuum. Even the simplest models have some underlying mechanism and complex models, at some level of detail, contain empirical descriptions in which the parameters have no mechanistic foundation and are applied because they fit data or a desired mathematical form. The level of detail at which a model switches to empirical formulations distinguishes its degree of mechanism.

All of the existing mainstem fish passage models leave out some variables which may be important. The simplest models, such as PAM and CRiSP0, rely solely on flow to describe survival and are of limited value for investigating other factors. Although FLUSH and CRiSP.1 version 5 consider the effects of fish age on survival, none of the models considers differences in fish conditions, fish bioenergetics or the river and tributary carrying capacities.


[Manual] [Contents] [Prev] [Next]
Columbia River Salmon Passage Model CRiSP.1.5 User Manual
Copyright © 1996, Columbia Basin Research. All rights reserved.
web@cbr.washington.edu