[Top] [Prev] [Next] [References]

7. Movements of individuals
7.1. Introduction and motivation

In constructing models of the dispersal of organisms, one of the basic choices is whether to focus on individuals or populations. This choice is often dictated by the objective of the model. For instance, models of the spread of populations on the time scale of generations needn't be concerned with individual movements. On the other hand, most population dispersal models do make assumptions about the movements of individuals, and, particularly if the model operates on relatively short time scales, it is often informative to determine the validity of the assumptions. Analyzing data of individual movements is a means of doing this.

One of the assumptions of the travel time model described previously (equations (4.7) and (4.8)) is that the movements of individuals follow a Wiener drift process. A restrictive property of this process is that disjoint movement increments are independent, no matter how fine the time scale. Clearly this property is limiting in describing the movement of animals. In the short term, an animal moving at a particular velocity will likely continue at that velocity. In the longer term, however, independent increments may be realistic.

Analyzing group release travel time data, as I have done in previous chapters, cannot confirm the Wiener drift process assumption. With this type of data, information about individual movements is lost, and several different movement processes could produce similar arrival distributions. To overcome these limitations, I analyze the movements of juvenile salmonids observed in radio-tracking experiments. I compare these data to two models: the Wiener process and a model based on the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process. This latter model has the following two properties: 1) In the short term, disjoint increments are correlated; and 2) as the time increment gets large, the process becomes indistinguishable from the Wiener process. In addition, the models are nested; as the correlation parameter in the O-U based model gets large, the behavior of the two models approaches each other.

In analyzing the radio-tracking data, I will address the following questions: 1) Is the distribution of movements consistent with the models, and if so, which model is more appropriate; and 2) is the correlation among movements important at the time scale of the data.


[Top] [Prev] [Next] [References]
Spatial and Temporal Models of Migrating Juvenile Salmon with Applications.
Home | Columbia R. DART | Status & Trends | Inseason Forecasts | Tools & Models | Research & Publications | Library | Site Map | Search
Please direct questions or comments to:
web@cbr.washington.edu
Columbia Basin Research,
School of Aquatic & Fishery Sciences,
University of Washington